| Title | The relationship between housing subsidies and supportive housing on neighborhood distress and housing satisfaction: does drug use make a difference? |
| Publication Type | Journal Article |
| Year of Publication | 2016 |
| Authors | Dickson-Gomez, Julia, Timothy McAuliffe, Chinekwu Obidoa, Katherine Quinn, and Margaret Weeks |
| Journal | Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pagination | 20 |
| Date Published | 2016 |
| ISSN | 1747-597X |
| Abstract | Since the 1970s, the dominant model for U.S. federal housing policy has shifted from unit-based programs to tenant-based vouchers and certificates. Because housing vouchers allow recipients to move to apartments and neighborhoods of their choice, such programs were designed to improve the ability of poor families to move into neighborhoods with less concentrated poverty. However, little research has examined whether housing voucher recipients live in less distressed neighborhoods than those without housing vouchers. There is much reason to believe that drug users may not be able to access or keep federal housing subsidies due to difficulties drug users, many of whom may have criminal histories and poor credit records, may have in obtaining free market rental housing. In response to these difficulties, permanent supportive housing was designed for those who are chronically homeless with one or more disabling condition, including substance use disorders. Little research has examined whether residents of permanent supportive housing units live in more or less economically distressed neighborhoods compared to low-income renters. |
| DOI | 10.1186/s13011-016-0064-3 |
| Alternate Journal | Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy |
