@article {2162,
	title = {Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: the needs-based model of reconciliation.},
	journal = {Personality \& social psychology bulletin},
	volume = {35},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009 Aug},
	pages = {1021-30},
	abstract = {Guided by the Needs-Based Model of Reconciliation, we hypothesized that being a member of a victimized group would be associated with a threat to the status and power of one{\textquoteright}s ingroup, whereas being a member of a perpetrating group would threaten the image of the ingroup as moral and socially acceptable. A social exchange interaction through which victims feel empowered by their perpetrators and perpetrators feel accepted by their victims was thus predicted to enhance the parties{\textquoteright} willingness to reconcile. Supporting the predictions across two experiments, members of the perpetrator group (Jews in Study 1 and Germans in Study 2) showed greater willingness to reconcile when they received a message of acceptance, rather than empowerment, from a member of the victimized group. Members of the victimized group (Arabs in Study 1 and Jews in Study 2) demonstrated the opposite effect. Applied and theoretical implications of these results are discussed.},
	keywords = {Arabs, Civil Disorders, Conflict (Psychology), Crime Victims, Dominance-Subordination, Emotions, Germany, Homicide, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Israel, Jews, Models, Psychological, Moral Obligations, Motivation, Power (Psychology), Prejudice, Social Desirability, Social Identification, Social Justice},
	issn = {0146-1672},
	doi = {10.1007/s10995-010-0650-3},
	author = {Shnabel, Nurit and Nadler, Arie and Ullrich, Johannes and Dovidio, John F and Carmi, Dganit}
}
