| Title | Guideline-Concordant Management of Opioid Therapy among HIV-Infected and Uninfected Veterans. |
| Publication Type | Journal Article |
| Year of Publication | 2014 |
| Authors | Gaither, Julie R., Joseph L. Goulet, William C. Becker, Stephen Crystal, Jennifer E. Edelman, Kirsha Gordon, Robert D. Kerns, David Rimland, Melissa Skanderson, Daniel Weisberg, Amy C. Justice, and David A. Fiellin |
| Journal | The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society |
| Date Published | 2014 Aug 21 |
| ISSN | 1528-8447 |
| Abstract | Whether patients receive guideline-concordant opioid therapy (OT) is largely unknown and may vary based on provider and patient characteristics. We assessed the extent to which HIV-infected and uninfected patients initiating long-term (≥90-days) OT received care concordant with American Pain Society/American Academy of Pain Medicine and Department of Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense guidelines by measuring receipt of 17 indicators during the first 6 months of OT. Of 20,753 patients, HIV-infected patients (n= 6,604) were more likely than uninfected patients to receive a primary care provider (PCP) visit within 1-month (52.0% vs. 30.9%) and 6-months (90.7% vs. 73.7%) and urine drug tests (UDTs) within 1-month (14.8% vs. 11.5%) and 6-months (19.5% vs. 15.4%; all p < .001). HIV-infected patients were also more likely to receive OT concurrent with sedatives (24.6% vs. 19.6%) and an untreated substance use disorder (SUD; 21.6% vs. 17.2%). Among both patient groups, only modest changes in guideline-concordance were observed over time: UDTs and OT concurrent with untreated SUDs increased, while sedative co-prescriptions decreased (all p for trend < .001). Over a 10-year period, on average, patients received no more than 40% of recommended indicators. OT guideline-concordant care is rare in primary care, varies by patient/provider characteristics, and has undergone few changes over time. |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.08.004 |
| Alternate Journal | J Pain |
